Daily Editorial
Sept. 25, 2000
Blame the test, not the students
Those who do not learn from their U.S. history SOL mistakes
are doomed to repeat them. And we’re not talking about Virginia’s students
here; we’re talking about the makers of the test.
That’s right. It’s the test that’s the problem, not the
students.
How else are we expected to understand why only 39 percent
of Virginia students passed last spring’s state Standards of Learning exam
on U.S. history?
Of the 27 SOL exams, which cover various subjects and grade
levels, the high school U.S. history test is the only one that was flunked
by most of the Virginia students who took it last spring.
There are several explanations floating around for this
educational anomaly.
Most teachers who have been asked to explain the poor test
results say the U.S. history SOL contains very narrow questions drawn from
a large body of material.
Lynn Davies, who chairs the history department at Fairfax’s
Westfield High School, pointed out that the state lists more than 400 pieces
of what it considers to be “essential knowledge” in U.S. history,
and the test of that knowledge consists of 75 questions.
“Trying to figure out what is most important to focus
on is impossible,” said Davies.
John Myers, who teachers U.S. history at Fairfax’s Edison
High School, expressed disappointment at the multiple-choice test questions.
There were no questions on the American Revolution or the
Civil War, but there was a question about the names of women’s military
units in World War II, Myers noted.
“It’s a very difficult test written at a very high
level,” Myers said.
Are these educators just whining? We don’t think so.
Why did 75 percent of Virginia’s high school students pass
the SOL test in world history to 1000 A.D., and 60 percent pass the test
in world history from 1000 A.D. to the present?
One additional explanation is that students must get 66
percent of the questions right on the U.S. history exam, compared with
54 percent and 57 percent, respectively, on the two world history tests.
Virginia Board of Education President Kirk T. Schroder
said the state board set a higher standard in U.S. history because it felt
the subject was unusually important.
Schroder also said that an advisory committee to the state
board is reviewing the history standards and will recommend changes next
month. But Schroder said the situation is not yet serious enough to pull
the exam.
Nearby Loudoun County schools Superintendent Edgar B. Hatrick
III disagrees. He says the state should stop giving the U.S. history exam
until it determines what’s wrong.
We have to agree with Hatrick. This problem is already
obvious and serious enough to warrant immediate action.
Since students starting with the class of 2004 will have
to pass at least six of the 12 high school SOL tests to graduate, there’s
no time to waste. The students deserve a better test than this one, and
they deserve it right away.
We also agree with teachers who say the state should add
open-ended essay questions to the U.S. history exam so students can better
utilize their analytical skills.
As time goes by, and as more test data becomes available,
we predict more and more changes will be necessary in Virginia’s flawed
SOL testing program. 
Letters to the Editor
World Newspapers
Media General’s Community
Publishing | News
from the Associated Press | NewsWorks | Gateway Virginia Alphabetical listing of all
Newspapers | Richmond
Times-Dispatch | Tampa
Tribune | The Roanoke Times
| Winston Salem Journal
| Raleigh News&Observer |
The Charlotte Observer |
The Washington Post
| The Washington Times |
The New York Times | The New York Post | Los Angeles Times |
USA Today | The
Christian Science Monitor Weather Maps
| Magazines&More
Go to News Stories | Go
to Obituaries | Go to Editorial
Return to the JM Home Page
*Copyright 1999, Media General Community Publishing
|
